[XCSSA] OT: simple, reliable wireless sensors
xcssa@xcssa.org
xcssa@xcssa.org
Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:47:28 -0500
There are wireless switches requiring no battery/electrical power supply
- they use a piezoelectric crystal, so that power is generated when the
switch is compressed. I don't remember the supplier but they have a
selection of light switches which they currently market.
-Kevin
xcssa-admin@xcssa.org wrote:
>On Friday 13 October 2006 04:24 am, xcssa-admin@xcssa.org wrote:
>
>
>>Hey folks,
>>
>>Supposing that I could not run wire to all the NC sensors I want to
>>deploy without drilling holes and running cable, what would be a
>>relatively inexpensive wireless communication protocol that only needs
>>to transmit a short-range binary signal (open/closed), without
>>interfering with extant 802.11 and 5.2GHz ranges? I have a ham
>>license but don't want to use the spectrum as a trash bin.
>>
>>
>
>BTW folks.. Travis is referring to "normally closed" home security/intrusion
>switches here.
>
>Travis.. I am shocked that you're even asking this! Using wireless for you
>security opens yourself up to an RF DoS that will make your place totally
>intrusion hackable.
>
>Second... the problem with a wireless solution is that your security is now
>going to be tied to your ability to monitor/replace batteries as needed (or
>be dependant upon AC power which can be shut off). Solar is an option... as
>long as the thieves don't find out about it an DoS your sunlight/charge path.
>
>Third, if you want to extend power.. you should move from a NC config to a NO
>config (for obvious reasons).
>
>If you can work around (or come to grips) with the issues above, then I'll
>help you with the RF/comm side of the equation.
>
>Tweeks
>_______________________________________________
>XCSSA mailing list
>XCSSA@xcssa.org
>http://xcssa.org/mailman/listinfo/xcssa
>
>
>