[XCSSA] AT&T IPTV
xcssa@xcssa.org
xcssa@xcssa.org
Sun, 27 May 2007 23:53:46 -0500
Since a story appeared on /. today
(http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/27/2315239&from=rss), I
decided to pass on my experiences with it.
To explain what it is for those not aware, AT&T U-Verse service is FTTN
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTTN), that is, fiber to your neighborhood
and copper to your house. Basically they bring in your phone and
network over a single dedicated pair, which they bridge to an existing
coax line. That comes into a VDSL modem (dubbed "residential gateway"),
which distributes IPTV over your existing coax network. Each TV
requires a set top box to decode the stream to your TV. They provide as
part of the service 2 set top boxes plus one DVR (for a total of 3
viewable monitors). I have a package of a 200 channel line-up (no
premium channels), plus HD service, and a 6Mb/1Mb internet service.
First, the good. The network is pretty reliable, and I can usually get
fully 6Mb down and 1Mb up to any endpoint at
http://speakeasy.net/speedtest. Not bad. The SD service is as good as
satellite, and the set top box does a decent job of deinterlacing and
scaling (not great, just not bad). Since it's much better than the
crappy analog signal coming from Time Warner, this is a big plus for me.
Also, I pay $89/month for the service I'm getting, which is
significantly cheaper than the Time Warner package I had, which was over
$130/month.
OK, that's where the good ends. Let's start with the installation. I
had to have 3 different crews come out over the course of the day to
even get the cabling from the node to my house straightened out. The
in-home install went OK, but I've had 3 techs back here in the past
month, and I've had 1 set top box replaced and my DVR replaced. They've
been pretty responsive, but it's been a HUGE hassle. But then there was
the time my phone was out for 3 days, and when they finally came out
there was a blown fuse at the node, directly related to the uverse install.
Now let's talk about the equipment. It sucks. Really horrible.
They're manufactured by Motorola and run Microsoft's IPTV software.
Think Media Center on WinCE. Really slow, buggy, non-configurable, and
the list goes on. The DVR is neigh unusable, but thank god you can
schedule recordings through the internet. It's actually faster to get
the computer, turn it on, connect to Yahoo, and search and schedule
recordings through a web browser than to use the remote for the set top
box. Yes, it's that horrible.
The software is pretty unconfigurable. They picked a nice white on
light blue interface that is transparent with the current channel
playing behind it. So it's nice and unreadable, especially for my wife
who needs more contrast to read it. It's completely unusable to her.
You can't change the colors at all. The closed captioning is
implemented incorrectly, is buggy, and is completely unconfigurable.
It's the only digital TV equipment I have ever used that can't be
configured according to the EIA-708 standard.
As for the VDSL modem, it's fairly capable as a router, but one of the
features is built-in Wifi, and it sucks. It drops packets like mad, at
a rate of 6-9% nominally. I have yet to disable it and connect my
Linksys up for wireless access, but I may cancel the service before I
get to it. You can't disable http access to it, even over wireless. It
does have an https service running, but that doesn't change the fact
that it comes preconfigured for WEP, not WPA, and you just can't off
wireless admin access.
Now on to the television service. Fortunately, AT&T is offering free HD
service for a year to new subscribers. Unfortunately I have been
charged every month for it, and I have to call and argue to have it
refunded. Because I wouldn't pay for it, given the choice. It's
HEAVILY compressed and is at best 720p, even the 1080i HDNet channels.
The picture quality is significantly worse than cable, and it pixelates
drops frames like mad. Sometimes the audio is off from the video,
sometimes a little, sometimes a lot. I have a very clean signal, and
I'm using HDMI cables. The FTTN just can't support good HDTV. Oh, and
you can only get 1 HD stream at a time. Period. It's good about just
NOT recording your shows without warning on the DVR if you're watching
HD on another TV.
The DVR has so many problems I don't even know where to start. It can't
even do simple things like record an entire series of shows at any time.
Yes, it has an option to do so, but it's a known issue that it doesn't
work. You have to manually set up the recordings throughout the week.
Even then it just won't record sometimes, or not start at the right
time. I missed recording the season finale of Heroes. Twice.
Sometimes it says I'm not subscribed to the channel and I can't watch
the recording. That brings me to DRM. Yep, it's got integrated DRM.
It's Microsoft. You cannot record some programs, period. They're
restricted. No TV for you!
Generally speaking, the technical support has been very responsive, and
I can get to tier 2 fairly quickly. Unfortunately for the most part all
they can do is either send someone out to replace the equipment or say,
"Yes, we know it sucks, but there's not much we can do about it." I
don't knock them for it, because they really try to get to the bottom of
things, and they are continually hearing about new problems. When they
go through the troubleshooting list, they've got about 6-8 known issues
they go through with me until they give up and pass me on to 2nd tier.
That's a lot of problems.
In conclusion, I have to recommend against anyone getting this service
unless you just don't care about the issues I've described. That is, if
you're just looking for a cheaper alternative to SDTV+Internet and don't
care about a reliable DVR, then this CAN be a cheaper alternative to
TWC. Packages start at $74/month. On the other hand, if you are, as I
suspect most people on this list are, a techie looking for the next
great technology, this isn't it. It sucks. It's worse than cable. I'm
going to cancel as soon as I get my installation rebates. It's just not
worth the hassle. I'd rather pay the higher price of cable for a
service that works rather than a half-assed, rushed, buggy, crippled
service.
If you like, I can tell you what I REALLY think :)
Nick